paskal
07-08 10:41 PM
the still unanswered question is why USPS bothered to make a 10pm delivery to an office!! :-)
wallpaper Clip Art Dancing People.
shantak
08-25 07:44 PM
Applied July 11th reached 12th NSC. I-140 approved from Texas, 08/12/2007 LUD on I-140. No receipts yet. No idea checks have been cashed or not (attorneys checks)
bebar
06-14 02:42 PM
Mine was filed on 06/01. No receipt so far.
Did any one filed on june 1 and still waiting for RD notice
Did any one filed on june 1 and still waiting for RD notice
2011 clip art tap dancing shoes
mchatrvd
09-10 02:27 PM
IV is not biased against any EB category. Their goal is to have process so that everyone gets GC in one year from date of application. These categories are set by USCIS. IV is currently in process of detailing solutions to end this misery of all EB category. More details can only be find in your respective state chapters. We cannot disclose details on the public forum. I will urge you to join your state chapter so that you are aware of what all IV is trying to do. IV is not trying to make system work for EB2 or EB1 but for everyone. There are lot of solutions, but we need to lobby and for that we need volunteer. Remember IV is not a corporate who has people working on its payroll and getting revenue. All of us need to contribute and volunteer. Trust me the day all of us (at least number of people blogging currently) join their state chapter and volunteer couple of hours in a month, you will not need lobby. The public voice be enough to convince Hill and House to pass a legislation.
more...
delhiguy
07-04 08:07 PM
Send him your resignation.
My labour and I-140 is approved last year and I am working with current employer from last 1 and half years. Employer is making good money trough me.
As now the dates are current, my employer is trying to exploit me.
He is not responding to my mails, and not picking my phone.
Last modified message which I got from him is that:
The whole financials for the company changes with filing 485 for you immediately. So, it is definitely a loss for company to process your 485 immediately.
you need to come with items that you are ready to compromise in return; so that the company also benefits by helping you."
I am very much in tension and he is talking to me.
Can someone suggest what may be the option for me?
My labour and I-140 is approved last year and I am working with current employer from last 1 and half years. Employer is making good money trough me.
As now the dates are current, my employer is trying to exploit me.
He is not responding to my mails, and not picking my phone.
Last modified message which I got from him is that:
The whole financials for the company changes with filing 485 for you immediately. So, it is definitely a loss for company to process your 485 immediately.
you need to come with items that you are ready to compromise in return; so that the company also benefits by helping you."
I am very much in tension and he is talking to me.
Can someone suggest what may be the option for me?
harpomarx
07-10 01:04 PM
Can anyone do a cartoon and we can post it on the internet?
How about a caricature of Gonzalez holding a sign as follows:
WASHINGTON�The Department of State has revised its July Flower Bulletin to reflect that all available flowers have been allocated for fiscal year 2007.
As a result, beginning today, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is rejecting applications to send flowers (Form I-356937) filed by aliens whose priority dates were current under the original July Flower Bulletin.
U.S. immigration law limits the number of employment-based immigrant flower receipts that may be issued each fiscal year.
How about a caricature of Gonzalez holding a sign as follows:
WASHINGTON�The Department of State has revised its July Flower Bulletin to reflect that all available flowers have been allocated for fiscal year 2007.
As a result, beginning today, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is rejecting applications to send flowers (Form I-356937) filed by aliens whose priority dates were current under the original July Flower Bulletin.
U.S. immigration law limits the number of employment-based immigrant flower receipts that may be issued each fiscal year.
more...
tonyHK12
02-18 06:32 PM
thanks SGP, devmaha
Total Contributions...........$6,675.00
Amount to be raised.......$43,325.00
.
.
Total Contributions...........$6,675.00
Amount to be raised.......$43,325.00
.
.
2010 Dance shoes clip art
roseball
09-10 10:09 AM
I don't know what this means. This is what it say in the Mumbai website.
Category India Most Other Countries
F1 22 July 2003 22 July 2003
FX 1 March 2003 1 March 2003
F2A 1 June 2005 1 June 2005
F2B 22 August 2001 22 August 2001
F3 15 Janurary 2001 15 Janurary 2001
F4 15 April 1999 15 April 1999
E1 Current Current
E2 22 January 2005 Current
E3 22 February 2002 1 June 2002
EW 1 June 2001 1 June 2001
E4 Current Current
E4-Religious Current Current
Either the US Consulate got the EB-3 India date wrong or there was a typo in the Oct Visa Bulletin. I wish/hope there was a typo in the bulletin and Mumbai consulate got it right....Cut Off Dates- Consulate General of the United States Mumbai, India (http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html)..But it seems they might have copied the date from China column of the visa bulletin...
Category India Most Other Countries
F1 22 July 2003 22 July 2003
FX 1 March 2003 1 March 2003
F2A 1 June 2005 1 June 2005
F2B 22 August 2001 22 August 2001
F3 15 Janurary 2001 15 Janurary 2001
F4 15 April 1999 15 April 1999
E1 Current Current
E2 22 January 2005 Current
E3 22 February 2002 1 June 2002
EW 1 June 2001 1 June 2001
E4 Current Current
E4-Religious Current Current
Either the US Consulate got the EB-3 India date wrong or there was a typo in the Oct Visa Bulletin. I wish/hope there was a typo in the bulletin and Mumbai consulate got it right....Cut Off Dates- Consulate General of the United States Mumbai, India (http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html)..But it seems they might have copied the date from China column of the visa bulletin...
more...
stucklabor
06-27 10:10 AM
First up, thanks to everyone for resolving this issue on their own, in a reasonable and civil manner.
In a truly democratic environment, we may want to modify the core IV goals to reflect that (Ideally I would prefer that there be a vote for what should be the core goals...after all most people here have contributed something towards the cause...and only those who have contributed should be allowed to vote...no free lunch).
1. Allow people to file for 485 and get EAD even if visa numbers are not available
2. Allow EAD to be FULLY portable without restrictons (i.e., irrespective of job description or job title or job location or salary).
The above two dont ask for sweeping changes in immigration laws such as increase visa numbers etc. etc. and are easy for the average American person to understand. And so can hopefuly be passed easily.
With the above two passed, I dont think many people will complain if it takes another 5 years to get their GC. Agree?
By the way, I have got my EAD card and my PD is also current. So the above two goals will be redundant for me. My story is that I am stuck in FBI namecheck. But the moderators have already indicated that it cant be one of the core goals. So I would not list that even if I would like that to be one of the core goals.
Santosh
Santosh, those are good suggestions that I will take up to the IV team.
1. The idea of a democratically elected IV goals is a good one but there are huge practical problems. As it stands, the present IV goals are those that most people have indicated are those that the organization should strive for, and from our discussions with Congress/Senate staff, these goals are achievable. With democratically selected goals, the IV core team would have the unenviable task of fighting for whatever goals the populace decides is right, without regard to the achievability of the goals. For instance, if the junta votes on goals, many people would say 'Full portability of GC' or 'Automatic clearance of all pending labor cert applications in the BECs'. Those would probably not fly. Our current talking point is that our goals are small changes to the process; we do not skip any steps; and we do not change the process significantly. A full portability to any job changes the process significantly. Even yesterday, Spgtopper met the staff member of a very powerful House member and the staffer was quite positive on our goals - we do not ask for more green cards, we limit our goals to ones that are reasonable.
2. IV goals are not written in stone. Name check is definitely an issue but it is an issue that not many of our people face. If our membership's problems changes from retrogression to name check, then we would have to work on that. It may be smarter to anticipate the magnitude of the problem and start work early. If you would be kind enough to partially lead the effort, that would be great. Logiclife is working on this issue on his own, and WaldenPond is also working on this. Please PM them. Logiclife is on vacation so he may take a while to respond.
In a truly democratic environment, we may want to modify the core IV goals to reflect that (Ideally I would prefer that there be a vote for what should be the core goals...after all most people here have contributed something towards the cause...and only those who have contributed should be allowed to vote...no free lunch).
1. Allow people to file for 485 and get EAD even if visa numbers are not available
2. Allow EAD to be FULLY portable without restrictons (i.e., irrespective of job description or job title or job location or salary).
The above two dont ask for sweeping changes in immigration laws such as increase visa numbers etc. etc. and are easy for the average American person to understand. And so can hopefuly be passed easily.
With the above two passed, I dont think many people will complain if it takes another 5 years to get their GC. Agree?
By the way, I have got my EAD card and my PD is also current. So the above two goals will be redundant for me. My story is that I am stuck in FBI namecheck. But the moderators have already indicated that it cant be one of the core goals. So I would not list that even if I would like that to be one of the core goals.
Santosh
Santosh, those are good suggestions that I will take up to the IV team.
1. The idea of a democratically elected IV goals is a good one but there are huge practical problems. As it stands, the present IV goals are those that most people have indicated are those that the organization should strive for, and from our discussions with Congress/Senate staff, these goals are achievable. With democratically selected goals, the IV core team would have the unenviable task of fighting for whatever goals the populace decides is right, without regard to the achievability of the goals. For instance, if the junta votes on goals, many people would say 'Full portability of GC' or 'Automatic clearance of all pending labor cert applications in the BECs'. Those would probably not fly. Our current talking point is that our goals are small changes to the process; we do not skip any steps; and we do not change the process significantly. A full portability to any job changes the process significantly. Even yesterday, Spgtopper met the staff member of a very powerful House member and the staffer was quite positive on our goals - we do not ask for more green cards, we limit our goals to ones that are reasonable.
2. IV goals are not written in stone. Name check is definitely an issue but it is an issue that not many of our people face. If our membership's problems changes from retrogression to name check, then we would have to work on that. It may be smarter to anticipate the magnitude of the problem and start work early. If you would be kind enough to partially lead the effort, that would be great. Logiclife is working on this issue on his own, and WaldenPond is also working on this. Please PM them. Logiclife is on vacation so he may take a while to respond.
hair clip art tap dancing shoes
vdlrao
09-10 02:29 AM
We want to do some thing for elimination of backlogs Especially for EB3 - India Else we wont see any more progress.
All EB3 people please share your thoughts to resolve this issue.
Unless and untill everybody in EB3 has contributed ataleast a $1000.00 to the immigrationvoice cause, its waste of time to discuss about the EB3-India movement. Any way we have to spend a lot more than $1000.00 in renewing EADs, H1Bs and H4s.
Otherwise just wait and pray for the CIR bill to pass. Then every body in the EB category will get the benefit being the EB3- India/China are the greatest benefitters.
All EB3 people please share your thoughts to resolve this issue.
Unless and untill everybody in EB3 has contributed ataleast a $1000.00 to the immigrationvoice cause, its waste of time to discuss about the EB3-India movement. Any way we have to spend a lot more than $1000.00 in renewing EADs, H1Bs and H4s.
Otherwise just wait and pray for the CIR bill to pass. Then every body in the EB category will get the benefit being the EB3- India/China are the greatest benefitters.
more...
satish_hello
08-28 10:57 PM
any Update?
hot saddle shoes dance shoes theme
gc28262
06-28 01:02 PM
Java Developer with Websphere (U.S. Citizen and Green Card Holder) jobs - Dice.com (http://seeker.dice.com/jobsearch/servlet/JobSearch?op=302&dockey=xml/8/1/81e683aef75162fdf78440e5f0d831c5@endecaindex&source=19&FREE_TEXT=Citizen&rating=99)
Title: Java Developer with Websphere (U.S. Citizen and Green Card Holder)
Skills: Java Developer with Websphere
Date: 6-8-2009
Description: **********U.S. Citizen and Green Card Holder Only*********
Interview Process: In-person interview after telephonic round.
Bachelor*s degree in Computer Science, Information Systems or related major (preferred)
- 7+ years of enterprise-level programming with multiple technology platforms with a concentrated focus on Websphere Portal (v6 and above) and Java development (required)
- Experience working with projects of moderate to high complexity (required)
- Strong understanding of Portlet technologies and practical hands-on experience developing and delivering JSR 168 Portlet solutions. (required)
- Understanding of emerging standards such as JSR286 (preferred)
- Ability to customize WebSphere portal themes and skins (strongly preferred)
- Exposure to AJAX development (preferred)
- Proficiency in Native Java, J2EE, JDBC, JSP, Multiple browser development (IE 6/7, Firefox) (required)
- Experience in web development technologies including Javascript, HTML, XML, XSLT, CSS (required)
- Experience deploying portal applications using XMLAccess (required)
- Working knowledge of web content management concepts (required)
- Working knowledge of workflow concepts (required)
- Troubleshooting skills * ability to resolve technical issues through research, debugging and investigation as well as the ability to multitask, prioritize, show initiative and respond quickly in a fast paced environment (required)
- Sun Java Certification (preferred)
- Exposure to Logging code, Log4J, Ant Scripts, JUnit (preferred)
- Knowledge of Eclipse, RAD or other IDE*s (preferred)
- Microsoft SQL Server (Versions 2000 & 2005) development, including SQL Server Integration Services, and administration (required)
- Deploy and manage application on WebSphere/HTTP Server (strongly preferred)
- Experience with Lotus Notes, as well as developing and integrating Lotus Connections (to include the configuration of Connections Portlets on a page) within a Portal application (strongly preferred)
- Proven ability and willingness to learn new open source middleware technologies
- Graphic design skills and knowledge of tools such as Adobe Photoshop (preferred)
- Experience with Adobe ColdFusion (Version 8)(strongly preferred)
- Demonstrated ability to work independently on assignments (required)
- Occasional overnight travel (required)
- Must be a U.S. Permanent Resident. Sponsorship is not offered for this role (required)
GTRAS Inc. is Equal Employer Opportunity Company
Email resume at stephen@gtras.com
Stephen Smith
Gtras, Inc
Phone: (703) 342-4282 ext: 113
Web: http://www.gtras.com (http://www.gtras.com/)
Title: Java Developer with Websphere (U.S. Citizen and Green Card Holder)
Skills: Java Developer with Websphere
Date: 6-8-2009
Description: **********U.S. Citizen and Green Card Holder Only*********
Interview Process: In-person interview after telephonic round.
Bachelor*s degree in Computer Science, Information Systems or related major (preferred)
- 7+ years of enterprise-level programming with multiple technology platforms with a concentrated focus on Websphere Portal (v6 and above) and Java development (required)
- Experience working with projects of moderate to high complexity (required)
- Strong understanding of Portlet technologies and practical hands-on experience developing and delivering JSR 168 Portlet solutions. (required)
- Understanding of emerging standards such as JSR286 (preferred)
- Ability to customize WebSphere portal themes and skins (strongly preferred)
- Exposure to AJAX development (preferred)
- Proficiency in Native Java, J2EE, JDBC, JSP, Multiple browser development (IE 6/7, Firefox) (required)
- Experience in web development technologies including Javascript, HTML, XML, XSLT, CSS (required)
- Experience deploying portal applications using XMLAccess (required)
- Working knowledge of web content management concepts (required)
- Working knowledge of workflow concepts (required)
- Troubleshooting skills * ability to resolve technical issues through research, debugging and investigation as well as the ability to multitask, prioritize, show initiative and respond quickly in a fast paced environment (required)
- Sun Java Certification (preferred)
- Exposure to Logging code, Log4J, Ant Scripts, JUnit (preferred)
- Knowledge of Eclipse, RAD or other IDE*s (preferred)
- Microsoft SQL Server (Versions 2000 & 2005) development, including SQL Server Integration Services, and administration (required)
- Deploy and manage application on WebSphere/HTTP Server (strongly preferred)
- Experience with Lotus Notes, as well as developing and integrating Lotus Connections (to include the configuration of Connections Portlets on a page) within a Portal application (strongly preferred)
- Proven ability and willingness to learn new open source middleware technologies
- Graphic design skills and knowledge of tools such as Adobe Photoshop (preferred)
- Experience with Adobe ColdFusion (Version 8)(strongly preferred)
- Demonstrated ability to work independently on assignments (required)
- Occasional overnight travel (required)
- Must be a U.S. Permanent Resident. Sponsorship is not offered for this role (required)
GTRAS Inc. is Equal Employer Opportunity Company
Email resume at stephen@gtras.com
Stephen Smith
Gtras, Inc
Phone: (703) 342-4282 ext: 113
Web: http://www.gtras.com (http://www.gtras.com/)
more...
house party clip art
willigetgc?
02-21 08:39 AM
Thank you all for contributing. We do need more funds though....please spread the word.
tattoo Free Clipart Shoes.
ub27
02-17 10:07 AM
Donated $50.
Paypal transaction ID: 4P412963A81144324
Paypal transaction ID: 4P412963A81144324
more...
pictures clip art shoes
obviously
07-09 05:06 PM
Please re-use... there are over 8 flyers READY TO USE in .pdf format !!!!
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=3361
Good luck!
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=3361
Good luck!
dresses Ice Skate clip art
sam2006
07-20 03:48 PM
Thanks !
Zooooom , gsc999, husker, sam, Raju and all others who were driving this initiative what is your take on this ?
I would like to be diplomatic on this ..
will like to go with the majority ..
but personally speaking.. may be we can have the drive till monday and see how it goes ..
Zooooom , gsc999, husker, sam, Raju and all others who were driving this initiative what is your take on this ?
I would like to be diplomatic on this ..
will like to go with the majority ..
but personally speaking.. may be we can have the drive till monday and see how it goes ..
more...
makeup discount wrestling shoes
satyakb
02-21 09:38 PM
Contributed $50.00
Transaction ID for this payment is: 1JR0904727135042B
Immigrationvoice.org support is very appreciated.
Transaction ID for this payment is: 1JR0904727135042B
Immigrationvoice.org support is very appreciated.
girlfriend Ballroom Dance Studio
abracadabra102
05-10 09:59 AM
A suggestion about the contents of these emails/letters:
Why do we insist on proposing the solution to our problems? One person wants to remove country limits, another wants 5 year EADs, yet another wants to file 485 regardless of priority dates.
I see 2 problems with this:
1- The external world doesn't care or understand. Do you think the average CNN viewer understands what retrogression or priority dates are? For that matter does anyone in the White House?
2- This divides us by EB category, country, pre/post July '07, EB3 to EB2 porter etc.
In your letters please focus on the problem. If invited to the table we can propose solutions, but now is the time to highlight the problems and the potential impact it has on the US economy, our families, and communities.
Examples:
Impact on US economy:
- I have significant buying power, however I am unable to make any substantial longer term financial decisions due to immigration uncertainties. I may be asked to leave the country on a moment's notice. If there was some stability, I may be looking to invest in a home or a new business
Impact on our families:
- My spouse cannot work. She is qualified and capable. Yet due to the vagaries of the immigration system, she cannot pursue full time employment without significant additional paperwork
Impact on the communities:
- Most of us hold strong political and social views. The current system makes it untenable and in some cases illegal (like donating to political parties) to participate in the democratic process. In the grand machine that is the American democratic system, we are probably the only group of people that are taxed and yet have no representation whatsoever.
Maybe these points are not strong enough. But if they are not, then it is not worth anyone's time to pay any attention. Find the legal immigrant population's "we do the jobs Americans will not do" slogan!
-a
good job!
Why do we insist on proposing the solution to our problems? One person wants to remove country limits, another wants 5 year EADs, yet another wants to file 485 regardless of priority dates.
I see 2 problems with this:
1- The external world doesn't care or understand. Do you think the average CNN viewer understands what retrogression or priority dates are? For that matter does anyone in the White House?
2- This divides us by EB category, country, pre/post July '07, EB3 to EB2 porter etc.
In your letters please focus on the problem. If invited to the table we can propose solutions, but now is the time to highlight the problems and the potential impact it has on the US economy, our families, and communities.
Examples:
Impact on US economy:
- I have significant buying power, however I am unable to make any substantial longer term financial decisions due to immigration uncertainties. I may be asked to leave the country on a moment's notice. If there was some stability, I may be looking to invest in a home or a new business
Impact on our families:
- My spouse cannot work. She is qualified and capable. Yet due to the vagaries of the immigration system, she cannot pursue full time employment without significant additional paperwork
Impact on the communities:
- Most of us hold strong political and social views. The current system makes it untenable and in some cases illegal (like donating to political parties) to participate in the democratic process. In the grand machine that is the American democratic system, we are probably the only group of people that are taxed and yet have no representation whatsoever.
Maybe these points are not strong enough. But if they are not, then it is not worth anyone's time to pay any attention. Find the legal immigrant population's "we do the jobs Americans will not do" slogan!
-a
good job!
hairstyles dancing shoes clip art
Rohan99
10-02 11:59 PM
If you are still waiting then please add your name
Important: if you receive the RN then plz write in front of your name, what is RN(if honored actual RN), how did u get RN(check, lawyer, called USCIS), FP date,
here is list of July 3rd at 9:03 received by R.William
--------------------------------------------------------
lutherpraveen
PDOCT05
i99
helpme1234
kingnaga
waitforgc123
Rohan99
gclongwaytogo
cool_cat
sivanu
GKBest
bluesky1
July 5th
--------
chalamcharla
July 16, 9:00 am at Nebraska signed by R Pitcher
--------------------------------------
viveckj99
Important: if you receive the RN then plz write in front of your name, what is RN(if honored actual RN), how did u get RN(check, lawyer, called USCIS), FP date,
here is list of July 3rd at 9:03 received by R.William
--------------------------------------------------------
lutherpraveen
PDOCT05
i99
helpme1234
kingnaga
waitforgc123
Rohan99
gclongwaytogo
cool_cat
sivanu
GKBest
bluesky1
July 5th
--------
chalamcharla
July 16, 9:00 am at Nebraska signed by R Pitcher
--------------------------------------
viveckj99
sankap
07-10 12:45 AM
@desi3933:
This comment was then obviously was not directed to you but to others who advise to "file AC21." Please show me any of my post where I have advised people to file for AC-21.
.
This comment was then obviously was not directed to you but to others who advise to "file AC21." Please show me any of my post where I have advised people to file for AC-21.
.
sreeni78
11-18 08:54 AM
Sent it to MI senators and my congressman.
No comments:
Post a Comment