Circus123
04-04 11:21 PM
This article is very interesting. The legal immigration dropped even though the applications flooded in last year.
Check these links out!
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jVzJBVTd1tawK227QQZltW_jigzwD8VRA5JO1
Interesting data statistics:
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/LPR_FR_2007.pdf
Check these links out!
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jVzJBVTd1tawK227QQZltW_jigzwD8VRA5JO1
Interesting data statistics:
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/LPR_FR_2007.pdf
wallpaper Happy Birthday Hello Kitty by
Sandeep
02-17 02:11 PM
I understand that cross chargeability becomes valid at the time of allocation of the visa number. So what do you mean by "in advance"?
SlowRoasted
05-01 10:13 PM
nice, i knew a matrix one was coming eventually.
2011 Happy birthday darling
Blog Feeds
05-25 08:30 AM
Immigration lawmakers try to pick winners and losers. The problem is that just like a broken analog clock with its hands frozen in place, the timing is mostly wrong. This brings me to one of my pet peeves. It bothers me that the immigration laws and agency regulations favor some fields of study and disfavor others. Why for example are students in the STEM subjects(Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) given 27 months of "optional practical training" -- a euphemism for work permission --- while liberal arts students get only 12 months? Do Congress and the immigration agencies think we have...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/05/to-what-degree-immigration-policy.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/05/to-what-degree-immigration-policy.html)
more...
pillagandhi
05-18 02:53 AM
I have an approved I 140 by my previous employer from 2007. (EB2I)
They would like to employ me again but in a higher position - they are doing the labor certification and I 140 process all ovver again.(EB2I)
Lawyer suggested that we apply for transferring PD after the second I 140 gets approved, instead of doing it at the time of applying for second I 140.
Is there any risk or benefit involved in either approach
They would like to employ me again but in a higher position - they are doing the labor certification and I 140 process all ovver again.(EB2I)
Lawyer suggested that we apply for transferring PD after the second I 140 gets approved, instead of doing it at the time of applying for second I 140.
Is there any risk or benefit involved in either approach
chil3
04-13 01:23 PM
it would be in minus.....
GC approvals are getting lesser & lesser...
GC approvals are getting lesser & lesser...
more...
boldm28
06-13 12:20 PM
Thanks appreciate it
2010 Happy birthday, Kitty Wells.
chriskalani
11-01 02:18 PM
Actually just money.
www.ChrisKalani.com (http://www.ChrisKalani.com)
www.ChrisKalani.com (http://www.ChrisKalani.com)
more...
texanmom
08-31 11:26 AM
I would be thrilled if you can fill one bus from the whole state of Texas...if only you can convince that many people to go!
Please follow progress on this thread:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12818
Please follow progress on this thread:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12818
hair Hello Kitty Happy Birthday
brahmam
10-10 11:06 AM
Nothing special.
1. your appointment notice
2. Driver's license.
We also took the 485 receipt notice and the passport, just in case.
Good luck.
1. your appointment notice
2. Driver's license.
We also took the 485 receipt notice and the passport, just in case.
Good luck.
more...
anilsal
06-14 11:36 PM
For the marriage, do you have any evidence of the marriage happening (like you can get something from the priest). You then go to the local registrar of marriage and show him the evidence. He will register the marriage and give you an official certificate. Your relatives in your home country should help you with this procedure.
For the DOB, look for FAQ on affidavits. Every immigration website has info on this.
For the DOB, look for FAQ on affidavits. Every immigration website has info on this.
hot Happy Birthday Kitty!
jasmin45
07-31 07:32 PM
Please update your information at http://www..com
This will help you and all.
Please run a search before creating new threads. There are several threads with link and most of the guys out here has already a record in there.
I would suggest to contact admin to close this thread.
This will help you and all.
Please run a search before creating new threads. There are several threads with link and most of the guys out here has already a record in there.
I would suggest to contact admin to close this thread.
more...
house Happy Birthday kitty
Macaca
11-01 05:36 PM
Democrats Again Look to Change GOP Motions; After Defeats, Leaders Studying Ways to Neuter Republicans' Motions to Recommit (http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_52/news/20763-1.html) By Jennifer Yachnin | ROLL CALL STAFF, October 31, 2007
Exasperated over Republicans' continued efforts - and occasional success - in thwarting the House floor schedule, Democratic leaders acknowledged Tuesday they are reviewing the chamber's rules to determine how to curb the minority's ability to put up roadblocks at critical moments in the legislative process.
House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter (D) said the committee's Democrats have begun meeting with both current and former Parliamentarians to discuss the chamber's rules and potential changes.
The New York lawmaker said those discussions have focused in part on the motion to recommit - one of the few procedural items in the minority party's toolbox that allows them to offer legislative alternatives when a bill hits the floor, and that Republicans have used to force difficult votes on Democrats or prompted legislation to be pulled from the floor - as well as other procedures, which she declined to detail.
Slaughter said no timeline exists for the review or potential alterations, however. "Nothing is imminent. We want to take our time and do it right," she said.
But one Democratic lawmaker, who asked not to be identified, said the majority is considering neutering the motion-to-recommit process and converting it to little more than a last-chance amendment for the minority party.
Under current House rules, the minority's motion can effectively shelve legislation through minor alterations to the language of their motion - specifically designating for a bill to be returned to its committee "promptly," rather than the usual "forthwith."
Republican leaders have used that strategy to force Democrats to either vote against measures they would otherwise support or vote to kill their own bill. Earlier this month, the GOP used that procedure to target a bill governing federal wiretapping and surveillance programs, prompting Democrats to scrub an expected vote.
Another Democratic lawmaker, who also is familiar with discussions and asked not to be identified because of the sensitive nature of those conversations, said that is only one option under consideration.
"We don't want to limit the minority's ability to have legitimate motions to recommit," the Democrat said.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) railed against Republicans' use of that particular tactic at his weekly press conference Tuesday, echoing complaints Democrats have raised off-and-on since March.
"The Republicans continue to use the motion to recommit for political purposes, not substantive purposes. Substantive purposes would be trying to change policy. For the most part, what they do with their motions to recommit are not change policy, but try to construct difficult political votes for Members," Hoyer said. "We understand that. To some degree, we did that as well. So it is not surprising."
While Hoyer acknowledged that Democrats had at times employed the same approach in the past, he criticized Republicans for using the method 22 times thus far in the 110th Congress, asserting that Democrats used the tactic only four times between 1995 and 1998.
"This is a game. It is a relatively cynical game," Hoyer added. "That doesn't mean it is not an effective game and causes questions. So we are trying to deal with that."
Democrats earlier had sought to alter the House rules on motions to recommit in May - an unusual step, given that the chamber's rules are rarely reopened mid-session - but Republicans rebelled on the House floor, and Democratic leaders agreed to forgo the changes, at least temporarily.
Democratic leaders suggested in August that they planned to offer legislation on the House floor aimed at dissuading Republicans from offering contentious procedural amendments tied to such hot-button issues as immigration. At the same time, Democrats hoped to provide insulation to their own Members with a separate vote on those topics, but have yet to produce any such resolutions.
Republicans have succeeded in winning 21 motions to recommit - the majority of which would not shelve the legislation they amend - in the past 10 months, a point that President Bush praised in a Tuesday meeting at the White House with Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), according to a GOP aide.
"Republicans and Democrats alike have lived under the very same germaneness rules since 1822, and changing them won't solve the majority's inherent inability to govern," Boehner spokesman Brian Kennedy said. "This isn't a question of rules, it's one of competence."
Exasperated over Republicans' continued efforts - and occasional success - in thwarting the House floor schedule, Democratic leaders acknowledged Tuesday they are reviewing the chamber's rules to determine how to curb the minority's ability to put up roadblocks at critical moments in the legislative process.
House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter (D) said the committee's Democrats have begun meeting with both current and former Parliamentarians to discuss the chamber's rules and potential changes.
The New York lawmaker said those discussions have focused in part on the motion to recommit - one of the few procedural items in the minority party's toolbox that allows them to offer legislative alternatives when a bill hits the floor, and that Republicans have used to force difficult votes on Democrats or prompted legislation to be pulled from the floor - as well as other procedures, which she declined to detail.
Slaughter said no timeline exists for the review or potential alterations, however. "Nothing is imminent. We want to take our time and do it right," she said.
But one Democratic lawmaker, who asked not to be identified, said the majority is considering neutering the motion-to-recommit process and converting it to little more than a last-chance amendment for the minority party.
Under current House rules, the minority's motion can effectively shelve legislation through minor alterations to the language of their motion - specifically designating for a bill to be returned to its committee "promptly," rather than the usual "forthwith."
Republican leaders have used that strategy to force Democrats to either vote against measures they would otherwise support or vote to kill their own bill. Earlier this month, the GOP used that procedure to target a bill governing federal wiretapping and surveillance programs, prompting Democrats to scrub an expected vote.
Another Democratic lawmaker, who also is familiar with discussions and asked not to be identified because of the sensitive nature of those conversations, said that is only one option under consideration.
"We don't want to limit the minority's ability to have legitimate motions to recommit," the Democrat said.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) railed against Republicans' use of that particular tactic at his weekly press conference Tuesday, echoing complaints Democrats have raised off-and-on since March.
"The Republicans continue to use the motion to recommit for political purposes, not substantive purposes. Substantive purposes would be trying to change policy. For the most part, what they do with their motions to recommit are not change policy, but try to construct difficult political votes for Members," Hoyer said. "We understand that. To some degree, we did that as well. So it is not surprising."
While Hoyer acknowledged that Democrats had at times employed the same approach in the past, he criticized Republicans for using the method 22 times thus far in the 110th Congress, asserting that Democrats used the tactic only four times between 1995 and 1998.
"This is a game. It is a relatively cynical game," Hoyer added. "That doesn't mean it is not an effective game and causes questions. So we are trying to deal with that."
Democrats earlier had sought to alter the House rules on motions to recommit in May - an unusual step, given that the chamber's rules are rarely reopened mid-session - but Republicans rebelled on the House floor, and Democratic leaders agreed to forgo the changes, at least temporarily.
Democratic leaders suggested in August that they planned to offer legislation on the House floor aimed at dissuading Republicans from offering contentious procedural amendments tied to such hot-button issues as immigration. At the same time, Democrats hoped to provide insulation to their own Members with a separate vote on those topics, but have yet to produce any such resolutions.
Republicans have succeeded in winning 21 motions to recommit - the majority of which would not shelve the legislation they amend - in the past 10 months, a point that President Bush praised in a Tuesday meeting at the White House with Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), according to a GOP aide.
"Republicans and Democrats alike have lived under the very same germaneness rules since 1822, and changing them won't solve the majority's inherent inability to govern," Boehner spokesman Brian Kennedy said. "This isn't a question of rules, it's one of competence."
tattoo Hello Kitty Coloring Pages
gkdgopi
07-06 01:22 PM
I applied for I140 on January and receipt date is Jan 12 2007, I upgraded to PP during last days of June, and the receipt date for it was July 2nd and today i was checking the status, the status is showing a receipt date of July 5th, i called customer service center they say that receipt date is July 5th and this is not a premium case. I understand that they have temporarily suspended PP for 140, but even though my request for upgrade to PP was rejected, the receipt date should be still Jan 12 2007 or will they change it to latest date when request for PP upgrade was denied, anyone facing this issue?
:mad:
:mad:
more...
pictures wish her happy birthday
Baka Otaku
10-30 06:24 PM
OKay, How do you get the drawing effect on Flash, like a line drawing itself, and gradually getting longer or something like that. Oyou know.
dresses happy birthday you like,
x1050us
01-06 09:34 PM
My 140 was filed for a future Team lead position. I am currently a Sr Sw Engg with the same employer. The job description is nearly the same. But I am not sure how this little quirk effects my AC21 eligibility. When does my 180 day start counting ? From filing date or from the date I get the Team lead title ?
more...
makeup Happy Birthday Hello Kitty
graphicaluser
08-06 12:09 PM
Hi,
I m without an assignment for about 3 months, but I m maintaining my status bcoz the employer is running the payroll with minimum salary. mean while i m expecting a full time offer from a company and they are willing to transfer the visa. so my question is that when the new company will be asking for the paystubs for the transfer, I have the paystubs which have a reduced(minimum) salary than what I was earning when I had a project, so will it affect my job offer or any questions will be asked by USCIS?
i know the questions are pretty open, I would appreciate any replies/advice on this,
thanks
I m without an assignment for about 3 months, but I m maintaining my status bcoz the employer is running the payroll with minimum salary. mean while i m expecting a full time offer from a company and they are willing to transfer the visa. so my question is that when the new company will be asking for the paystubs for the transfer, I have the paystubs which have a reduced(minimum) salary than what I was earning when I had a project, so will it affect my job offer or any questions will be asked by USCIS?
i know the questions are pretty open, I would appreciate any replies/advice on this,
thanks
girlfriend Hello Kitty Happy 21st
mygcstory
07-16 11:11 PM
Hi,
I have an approved labor, H1 Visa stamp still valid 2.5 years more. I will be applying for I140/485 once this debacle settles.
Can any one tell me, what are the consequences of leaving the US for a weeks vacation in India, while the application is in progress? Some say it is abandoning the application.....Would anyone know
Also, my wife is now on a B1. When I add her name to the 140/485 and she comes back as an H4, will it cause issues
Thanks for taking the time
-GC
I have an approved labor, H1 Visa stamp still valid 2.5 years more. I will be applying for I140/485 once this debacle settles.
Can any one tell me, what are the consequences of leaving the US for a weeks vacation in India, while the application is in progress? Some say it is abandoning the application.....Would anyone know
Also, my wife is now on a B1. When I add her name to the 140/485 and she comes back as an H4, will it cause issues
Thanks for taking the time
-GC
hairstyles Hello Kitty happy birthday
DoubleN
06-28 02:27 PM
I believe you should inform about the current status of your wife.
ItIsNotFunny
04-27 09:46 AM
Will post something 3.
Great Job !!!
Great Job !!!
Blog Feeds
02-23 12:40 PM
My law school roommate and long time friend Henry Olsen is the vice president of the conservative think tank the American Enterprise Institute. He's written an essay for the National Review entitled "The Way of the Whigs" and it talks about the danger the GOP faces in terms of long term survival. This might seem strange given the recent polling problems the Democrats have experienced, but Henry writes that there are long term forces at work that Republicans need to heed. One is the growing Hispanic electorate which has shifted decidedly toward the Democrats over the last two election cycles....
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/02/the-way-of-the-whigs.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/02/the-way-of-the-whigs.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment