Rb_newsletter
07-17 09:09 PM
To answer you in one line, contact a immigration attorney.
To answer you briefly, GC is not something that your company or you can handle by yourself. You definitely need an attorney. There are 3 stages and so many things involved in each stage:eek:. If you get hold of good attorney firm they will have all the templates and will guide you.
To answer you briefly, GC is not something that your company or you can handle by yourself. You definitely need an attorney. There are 3 stages and so many things involved in each stage:eek:. If you get hold of good attorney firm they will have all the templates and will guide you.
wallpaper Nicole Richie is a Grecian
chris
09-25 03:08 PM
Again i heard one more new word from IO today " File is in Adjudications Area ".
Any idea what is that mean ?
Any idea what is that mean ?
freddyCR
January 9th, 2005, 04:23 PM
Just returned from a relaxing week end at Jaco Beach, Pacific Ocean- Costa Rica .I saw quite a lot of beautiful sights. This is the first prize I got once I arrived.
I'd appreciate your comments. ;)
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/2555Dusk_at_Bohio_Street_-_Jaco_cr_med.jpg
I'd appreciate your comments. ;)
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/2555Dusk_at_Bohio_Street_-_Jaco_cr_med.jpg
2011 nicole richie tattoo
rkgc
03-31 12:26 PM
Hi,
I got my PERM labor approved yesterday, for applying I-140 were can I find the processing dates for I-140? I mean specific to Country? Because, if I go to https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC the processing time for "Skilled worker or professional" is April, 1 2008, does this date apply for all? Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
RK
I got my PERM labor approved yesterday, for applying I-140 were can I find the processing dates for I-140? I mean specific to Country? Because, if I go to https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC the processing time for "Skilled worker or professional" is April, 1 2008, does this date apply for all? Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
RK
more...
sss9i
09-28 03:12 PM
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=ace7ec20cfbd4110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=82b06a9fec745110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=82b06a9fec745110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D
kirupa
03-29 12:12 PM
Hey HybridIllusion,
It all depends on what format your 2d image is in. If it is in AI or EPS, you can automatically import the image into Swift 3D and animate it. If it is a JPG or GIF, you might have a few more steps before importing into Swift 3D.
Take your image and import it into Flash. Export the Flash animation as AI (adobe illustrator) by going to File | Publish Settings | File Types tab. Check the AI box and then publish the movie. The image will be exported in the AI format. From the AI format, you can import into Swift 3D and animate with no limitations.
It all depends on what format your 2d image is in. If it is in AI or EPS, you can automatically import the image into Swift 3D and animate it. If it is a JPG or GIF, you might have a few more steps before importing into Swift 3D.
Take your image and import it into Flash. Export the Flash animation as AI (adobe illustrator) by going to File | Publish Settings | File Types tab. Check the AI box and then publish the movie. The image will be exported in the AI format. From the AI format, you can import into Swift 3D and animate with no limitations.
more...
rb_248
12-07 02:48 PM
Can someone please provide live updates on what is happening on the floor now? I can't open video links from work and there are many more that can't open video links from work.
Thanks :confused:
Thanks :confused:
2010 Ярлыки: nicole richie
raju_abc
12-08 10:56 PM
Hi,
I wanted to know that suppose i withdraw my H1 ,
then does it means that my H1 is gone?
And if i want to have H1 again if future (say next year) , will i have to go through the lottery again?
I wanted to know that suppose i withdraw my H1 ,
then does it means that my H1 is gone?
And if i want to have H1 again if future (say next year) , will i have to go through the lottery again?
more...
EndlessWait
03-25 02:51 PM
I had FP done way back in October 07..but there is no status change LUD on I-485..what to do??.:confused:..Do I take an appointment to talk to an officer or simply call USCIS ..
why r u worried about LUD..cmon guys..u've done ur part..so why r u worried ..they'll update when they do.
why r u worried about LUD..cmon guys..u've done ur part..so why r u worried ..they'll update when they do.
hair Nicole Richie
gimme Green!!
06-17 11:18 PM
Yes. you can file i140 and 485 concurrently
Engineer!!
Engineer!!
more...
joo
03-23 12:08 PM
Has anyone travel to london Can anyone suggest which is the best airport transfers
I heared of some
http://www.airportransfers.net
http://www.ncc24hr.com
http://www.minicabsbytext.com/
Any Suggestion Remarks about the price reliability?
I heared of some
http://www.airportransfers.net
http://www.ncc24hr.com
http://www.minicabsbytext.com/
Any Suggestion Remarks about the price reliability?
hot nicole richie before and after
WashingtonSt
02-22 12:36 AM
This is my situation:
I am in my 8th year of H1B extension (2 one year extensions after 6 years)
I had my LC I140 approved, but due to retrogression I cannot continue with the adjustment of status.
This is my question:
If I move to a new position that would require me to file new LC (PERM), am I still subjected to the 365 days rule?
I am confused because my employer filed the LC 365 days prior to my H1B expire on the 6th year in order to get the extension. Now, since I can only have one year extension and I have less than 1 year left on my H1B visa, can the new LC still be filed? Will this jeopardize future H1B extension?
Am I missing something here? Is there another strategy?
Based on other discussion, it seemed that I am eligible for 3 years extension. But there are still 200 days left on my H1B visa. I suppose 3 years extension cannot be filed until near expiration date.
I am in my 8th year of H1B extension (2 one year extensions after 6 years)
I had my LC I140 approved, but due to retrogression I cannot continue with the adjustment of status.
This is my question:
If I move to a new position that would require me to file new LC (PERM), am I still subjected to the 365 days rule?
I am confused because my employer filed the LC 365 days prior to my H1B expire on the 6th year in order to get the extension. Now, since I can only have one year extension and I have less than 1 year left on my H1B visa, can the new LC still be filed? Will this jeopardize future H1B extension?
Am I missing something here? Is there another strategy?
Based on other discussion, it seemed that I am eligible for 3 years extension. But there are still 200 days left on my H1B visa. I suppose 3 years extension cannot be filed until near expiration date.
more...
house Nicole Richie
Macaca
05-15 10:07 AM
Congress's Start (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/12/AR2007051201099.html) -- It's time to begin recording concrete achievements, Sunday, May 13, 2007
FOUR MONTHS into the 110th Congress is too early to assign grades to the new Democratic majority -- but not too soon to remind lawmakers that most of their self-assigned tasks remain undone; that progress in the next few months on immigration, trade and lobbying reform is critical; and that this Congress will be judged on what it accomplished -- and on where it punted.
The biggest punt thus far concerns entitlement spending, an issue on which the administration, chiefly Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., has been seeking to jump-start discussions. This is an auspicious moment that Democrats seem determined to squander. First, the Democratic Congress has a lame-duck Republican president who could take, or at least share, the blame for cuts that will have to be part of any solution. Second, as members of Congress well know, the longer they wait to take on Medicare and, particularly, Social Security, the harder the problem they will face.
Democrats have seized on Vice President Cheney's comments to Fox News in January about raising payroll taxes -- "This president has been very, very clear on his position on taxes, and nothing's changed" -- as a rationale for why they can't risk bargaining with the administration. But this is an excuse, not a legitimate basis for inaction. After all, Mr. Cheney also said there would be "no preconditions."
Meanwhile, lawmakers for the most part have used their oversight powers usefully, though we wish more energy were spent examining torture policies, for instance, and less on subpoenaing the secretary of state. Although the budget process has yet to play itself out, the adoption of tough pay-as-you-go rules to constrain new mandatory spending has had a surprisingly beneficial effect in restraining demands for new programs. The Senate's passage of a measure to strengthen the Food and Drug Administration's regulatory powers is an important step.
Still unanswered is whether Democrats will deliver on their campaign promises and whether both sides will find ways to forge consensus on issues of common concern. House Democrats' "Six for '06" campaign pledge has so far amounted to "None in '07." Much of this (federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, for instance) is out of Democrats' control, given the Senate's supermajority rules and President Bush's veto pen; in some cases (having Medicare negotiate drug prices, for example), that's just as well. But even such relatively noncontroversial matters as increasing the minimum wage remain undone. Voters are starting to notice, and the coming weeks will be crucial for Democrats to put some actual accomplishments on the board.
On a matter that is within their control, it's still uncertain whether House Democrats will produce a lobbying and ethics reform package worthy of their campaign pledges to end the "culture of corruption." The key tests will be whether lawmakers require lobbyists to disclose the bundles of campaign cash they deliver (as the Senate version of the measure has done) and whether the House will create a more credible ethics process, including some kind of independent arm to assess and investigate ethics allegations.
On immigration, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) is right to bring to the floor last year's measure, which won the support of 23 Republicans. The clock is ticking on this incendiary topic, and the administration has not improved matters by pushing an unbalanced and punitive plan. If Mr. Bush is looking for a legacy issue beyond Iraq, this could be it, but he is, so far, blowing the chance.
On trade, an agreement that seems to clear the way for approval of trade pacts with Peru and Panama is a start, but only that. Much more important is the passage of deals with Colombia and South Korea, and extension of presidential trade negotiating authority, which is needed to complete a new global trade treaty. Congressional leaders should work with Mr. Bush to extend the authority -- not because they like or trust him but because doing so will be better for the economy in which they, too, have an important stake.
FOUR MONTHS into the 110th Congress is too early to assign grades to the new Democratic majority -- but not too soon to remind lawmakers that most of their self-assigned tasks remain undone; that progress in the next few months on immigration, trade and lobbying reform is critical; and that this Congress will be judged on what it accomplished -- and on where it punted.
The biggest punt thus far concerns entitlement spending, an issue on which the administration, chiefly Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., has been seeking to jump-start discussions. This is an auspicious moment that Democrats seem determined to squander. First, the Democratic Congress has a lame-duck Republican president who could take, or at least share, the blame for cuts that will have to be part of any solution. Second, as members of Congress well know, the longer they wait to take on Medicare and, particularly, Social Security, the harder the problem they will face.
Democrats have seized on Vice President Cheney's comments to Fox News in January about raising payroll taxes -- "This president has been very, very clear on his position on taxes, and nothing's changed" -- as a rationale for why they can't risk bargaining with the administration. But this is an excuse, not a legitimate basis for inaction. After all, Mr. Cheney also said there would be "no preconditions."
Meanwhile, lawmakers for the most part have used their oversight powers usefully, though we wish more energy were spent examining torture policies, for instance, and less on subpoenaing the secretary of state. Although the budget process has yet to play itself out, the adoption of tough pay-as-you-go rules to constrain new mandatory spending has had a surprisingly beneficial effect in restraining demands for new programs. The Senate's passage of a measure to strengthen the Food and Drug Administration's regulatory powers is an important step.
Still unanswered is whether Democrats will deliver on their campaign promises and whether both sides will find ways to forge consensus on issues of common concern. House Democrats' "Six for '06" campaign pledge has so far amounted to "None in '07." Much of this (federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, for instance) is out of Democrats' control, given the Senate's supermajority rules and President Bush's veto pen; in some cases (having Medicare negotiate drug prices, for example), that's just as well. But even such relatively noncontroversial matters as increasing the minimum wage remain undone. Voters are starting to notice, and the coming weeks will be crucial for Democrats to put some actual accomplishments on the board.
On a matter that is within their control, it's still uncertain whether House Democrats will produce a lobbying and ethics reform package worthy of their campaign pledges to end the "culture of corruption." The key tests will be whether lawmakers require lobbyists to disclose the bundles of campaign cash they deliver (as the Senate version of the measure has done) and whether the House will create a more credible ethics process, including some kind of independent arm to assess and investigate ethics allegations.
On immigration, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) is right to bring to the floor last year's measure, which won the support of 23 Republicans. The clock is ticking on this incendiary topic, and the administration has not improved matters by pushing an unbalanced and punitive plan. If Mr. Bush is looking for a legacy issue beyond Iraq, this could be it, but he is, so far, blowing the chance.
On trade, an agreement that seems to clear the way for approval of trade pacts with Peru and Panama is a start, but only that. Much more important is the passage of deals with Colombia and South Korea, and extension of presidential trade negotiating authority, which is needed to complete a new global trade treaty. Congressional leaders should work with Mr. Bush to extend the authority -- not because they like or trust him but because doing so will be better for the economy in which they, too, have an important stake.
tattoo nicole richie joel madden baby
brick2006
11-02 02:34 PM
One of my friends has goofed up his labor filing:
His actual date of termination with his previous company was 5/31/2007, but in the labor filing he has said that he was employed with the previous company till 6/30/2007....
he is ready for filing his 140(EB2)? can he correct his dates of when he files for 140....
WILL HE HAVE TO file for labor again??????????:(
His actual date of termination with his previous company was 5/31/2007, but in the labor filing he has said that he was employed with the previous company till 6/30/2007....
he is ready for filing his 140(EB2)? can he correct his dates of when he files for 140....
WILL HE HAVE TO file for labor again??????????:(
more...
pictures Nicole Richie
dhesha
01-07 02:21 PM
////\\\\\
I do. what is the context?
I do. what is the context?
dresses Nicole Richie pregnant?
blao
07-15 07:06 PM
bump
more...
makeup nicole richie2 Nicole Richie
jcrajput
10-23 08:10 AM
I have one question: My I-485 applcation (employment based) was rejected due to I-130 attachment in error.
If USCIS reject my entire package of I-485 because I have attached I-130 application. What are my options? Is there any law that USCIS can only reject I-130 and accept I-485 appplications (myself and for my wife)? I have seperate fee checks for all the applications.
Please help me....
If USCIS reject my entire package of I-485 because I have attached I-130 application. What are my options? Is there any law that USCIS can only reject I-130 and accept I-485 appplications (myself and for my wife)? I have seperate fee checks for all the applications.
Please help me....
girlfriend Nicole Richie
semiGator
12-16 10:39 AM
As the article stated there are 47 million latinos and majority of them are citizens.....we don't have that kind of numbers to make an impact on either party.
hairstyles Brody Jenner amp; Nicole Richie.
Domino
11-03 02:14 AM
Hello,
If one has EB1 (Extraordinary Ability) Pending, is one allowed to stay in the US until the case is decided? I know it may takes at least an year for the final approval...
If one has EB1 (Extraordinary Ability) Pending, is one allowed to stay in the US until the case is decided? I know it may takes at least an year for the final approval...
freddyCR
February 5th, 2005, 05:41 PM
This is the name of this beautiful Church, dedicated to the patron Virgin of Costa Rica, located in the city of Cartago.
Her name and image are linked to multiple miraculous healings, and it is the destiny of a national pilgrimage, every August 10 th.
Hope you like them. As always, any comment is welcome.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/cartago1Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/DSCF3365_1Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/DSCF3368_1Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/DSCF3360_1Medium.jpg
Her name and image are linked to multiple miraculous healings, and it is the destiny of a national pilgrimage, every August 10 th.
Hope you like them. As always, any comment is welcome.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/cartago1Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/DSCF3365_1Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/DSCF3368_1Medium.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/DSCF3360_1Medium.jpg
yabadaba
06-21 10:25 AM
thats means its not approved. u cant file for i140 without labor approval..hence cannot file 485 also.
sorry for the bad news
sorry for the bad news
No comments:
Post a Comment