coopheal
05-20 08:01 AM
Please contribute for IV's causes (which are your causes as well)
wallpaper sad quotes about rain.
amitjoey
05-21 04:01 PM
I will match dollar for dollar all contributions for the next 3 hours, if some one from IV will confirm the amount.
Just paid $100 for this effort. Here are the details of transaction -
Transaction ID: 98W07634EB610043U
An email with your order summary has been sent to xxxxxx@gmail.com
Merchant Contact Information
Immigration Voice
donations@immigrationvoice.org
850-391-4966
SUGAUR >> YOU ROCK :)
Thank you LONGGCQUE- You are the first in this 3hr effort.
and Thank you Sugaur
Just paid $100 for this effort. Here are the details of transaction -
Transaction ID: 98W07634EB610043U
An email with your order summary has been sent to xxxxxx@gmail.com
Merchant Contact Information
Immigration Voice
donations@immigrationvoice.org
850-391-4966
SUGAUR >> YOU ROCK :)
Thank you LONGGCQUE- You are the first in this 3hr effort.
and Thank you Sugaur
jchan
02-15 02:29 PM
Sorry, you totally got me wrong. What I suggested is that you may want to open a thread 'Campaign to remove the similar/same job requirements in AC21 cases', it can happen at the same time we request pre-application of AOS. This thread is for discussion of pre-application of AOS, so if this is not your goal, you may open a thread for your own goals, but please leave this thread to us to discuss the pre-application of AOS.
thank you.
I hear some people saying childish things like hijacking this thread if anybody says anything different from what they say. What do you prefer, should I open another thread with title "oppose prefiling AOS", nobody wins neither will I or you when somebody does that. Please tolerate others views then they will tolerate yours.
Without strengthening AC21 if you allow everyone to file AOS then anti eb folks like Grassley, Sanders, Sessions, Durbin will move from targeting H1b to targeting EAD. It takes 6 months to get Perm approval, with pre filing AOS everyone can get EAD in 6 months, anti eb folks and USCIS know that people will be jumping to EAD to escape H1 crackdown, what do you think they will do, they will add amendments and Bills to put restrictions on hiring EAD just like they put restrictions on hiring H1b. We cannot make EAD into another H1b like hell.
Prefiling should be done to give relief to people who missed July fiasco only after
1. Remove\dilute same similar job requirement
2. Make sure EAD is extended without any rfe. USCIS will invent thousand things to issue rfe, EAD should be in a different league to h1 and it should not turn into another h1 where you are slapped with rfe left right and center. Example Pay stub rfe, ability to pay rfe, customer Purchase order RFE etc etc etc, Green card holders don�t have any problem working in these same jobs so why should EAD people face this nonsense (otherwise it is just like h1). Before people complain this will become like a green card, lets me answer in advance, if a person from ROW can get his green card within 12 months of coming to US, why cannot people from India\china who have worked in US for the last 5 to 10 years get the above mentioned relief on EAD. EAD should be superior to h1.the only restriction should be you should work in the same field, i.e. if your labor certification is for Software engineer, programmer analyst etc , then you work in a software related job and cannot become a greeter in walmart :-)
Without strengthening EAD\AC21 with the above mentioned items you are turning EAD into just another h1.If we push for prefiling AOS without strengthening Ac21 it is a big disadvantage and slap on the face for all the people with older priority date. Because of July fiasco when everybody got current and filed for AOS, USCIS issued GC to people from 2006 leaving behind people from 2003, 04 and 05. USCIS should have gradually moved the dates from 2003 to 04 to 05 that way people with older PD would have got it first. With prefiling AOS it will become a lottery like in August 2008 where 2006 PD got GC over 03,04 and 05 in eb2. Safeguards have to be put in place for order of priority date otherwise USCIS will indulge in this lottery mode and excuse there behavior by claiming they did this to save visa wastage.
thank you.
I hear some people saying childish things like hijacking this thread if anybody says anything different from what they say. What do you prefer, should I open another thread with title "oppose prefiling AOS", nobody wins neither will I or you when somebody does that. Please tolerate others views then they will tolerate yours.
Without strengthening AC21 if you allow everyone to file AOS then anti eb folks like Grassley, Sanders, Sessions, Durbin will move from targeting H1b to targeting EAD. It takes 6 months to get Perm approval, with pre filing AOS everyone can get EAD in 6 months, anti eb folks and USCIS know that people will be jumping to EAD to escape H1 crackdown, what do you think they will do, they will add amendments and Bills to put restrictions on hiring EAD just like they put restrictions on hiring H1b. We cannot make EAD into another H1b like hell.
Prefiling should be done to give relief to people who missed July fiasco only after
1. Remove\dilute same similar job requirement
2. Make sure EAD is extended without any rfe. USCIS will invent thousand things to issue rfe, EAD should be in a different league to h1 and it should not turn into another h1 where you are slapped with rfe left right and center. Example Pay stub rfe, ability to pay rfe, customer Purchase order RFE etc etc etc, Green card holders don�t have any problem working in these same jobs so why should EAD people face this nonsense (otherwise it is just like h1). Before people complain this will become like a green card, lets me answer in advance, if a person from ROW can get his green card within 12 months of coming to US, why cannot people from India\china who have worked in US for the last 5 to 10 years get the above mentioned relief on EAD. EAD should be superior to h1.the only restriction should be you should work in the same field, i.e. if your labor certification is for Software engineer, programmer analyst etc , then you work in a software related job and cannot become a greeter in walmart :-)
Without strengthening EAD\AC21 with the above mentioned items you are turning EAD into just another h1.If we push for prefiling AOS without strengthening Ac21 it is a big disadvantage and slap on the face for all the people with older priority date. Because of July fiasco when everybody got current and filed for AOS, USCIS issued GC to people from 2006 leaving behind people from 2003, 04 and 05. USCIS should have gradually moved the dates from 2003 to 04 to 05 that way people with older PD would have got it first. With prefiling AOS it will become a lottery like in August 2008 where 2006 PD got GC over 03,04 and 05 in eb2. Safeguards have to be put in place for order of priority date otherwise USCIS will indulge in this lottery mode and excuse there behavior by claiming they did this to save visa wastage.
2011 quotes about rain. sad quotes
Openarms
03-05 11:02 AM
Not so fast buddy. We are not on forums 24/7
The thread was posted last night and how can you expect instant reply.:D
In future if someone wants to reach us if you have any question, it is better to directly contact us rather than posting on the forum as we do not read every post.
A couple of people who got the letters have already emailed us and let us all review the letter to see if we are getting what we need from this request. Let us all agree if we want to pursue this and contribute towards this. Once we have enough people, we can go forward.
This is one of the positive steps that we have taken here and glad that we got the response from CIS. So now IV needs to get expose this letter as public as possible to get the USCIS tactics out (senate, congress, president, dhs head and all in the world). And if need be that we all need to contribute to the money they are asking. This is the good one.
The thread was posted last night and how can you expect instant reply.:D
In future if someone wants to reach us if you have any question, it is better to directly contact us rather than posting on the forum as we do not read every post.
A couple of people who got the letters have already emailed us and let us all review the letter to see if we are getting what we need from this request. Let us all agree if we want to pursue this and contribute towards this. Once we have enough people, we can go forward.
This is one of the positive steps that we have taken here and glad that we got the response from CIS. So now IV needs to get expose this letter as public as possible to get the USCIS tactics out (senate, congress, president, dhs head and all in the world). And if need be that we all need to contribute to the money they are asking. This is the good one.
more...
somegchuh
07-19 04:46 PM
I agree with you there is no point in moving to canada if u are going to do the same job there. You might as well do it here.
The point is that if you move to canada or any other place you have the freedom to take a higher position and your spouse gets to work too. Thereby improving your income. I think these decisions are really based on personal circumstances. For some ppl it might be the right thing to do, for some it may not be.
Again what is the point in moving to Canada just because you are tired in waiting here. Are you going to do the same job in Canada. If yes, I would do that here.
For me, only person who could move to Canada is:
1. Way better career jump.
2. Do not have wavery mind of coming back to US. If happens come back, but do not start with that as you will not lead happy life.
3. Keep the GC processing alive in US.
The point is that if you move to canada or any other place you have the freedom to take a higher position and your spouse gets to work too. Thereby improving your income. I think these decisions are really based on personal circumstances. For some ppl it might be the right thing to do, for some it may not be.
Again what is the point in moving to Canada just because you are tired in waiting here. Are you going to do the same job in Canada. If yes, I would do that here.
For me, only person who could move to Canada is:
1. Way better career jump.
2. Do not have wavery mind of coming back to US. If happens come back, but do not start with that as you will not lead happy life.
3. Keep the GC processing alive in US.
cards
08-01 04:28 PM
my company might use this one and i have no say on this. just wonder whether the new york office is good in regard to GC process.
FRAGOMEN SUCKS TOTALLY - but unfortunately I got no choice - my employer uses these morons for immigration services. My reasoning is based on my experiences below:
1. I have been mailing Fragomen for 3 MONTHS (YES THREE FULL MONTHS) to initiate my H1 extn 6 months prior to my visa expiry cause I had a need to travel outside the US in a short notice and I did not want to be stuck because of me not having my visa extn papers in time. Despite 5 e-mails and 5 voice mails - there was no response from FRAGOMEN. Escalated this with my company and we had a conference call to discuss this issue with Fragomen. Guess what FRAGOMEN's Client Service Manager had to say when I asked her about they not answering my e-mails and voice mails for 3 months - "I CANNOT ANSWER THIS QUESTION SINCE EVERYCASE IS DEALT DIFFERENTLY AND WE DECIDED TO INITIATE UR H1 EXTN 3 MONTH PRIOR TO UR VISA EXPIRY." WTF!!! Who the hell are they to decide on my professional/personal travel needs? I really wish I had their job - do nothing at all and when questioned say "I cannot answer that question".
2. To make sure FRAGOMEN do not mess up my 485 as well, I asked them in the same call the time they would take to process and file my 485. The client service manager promised me that they would file my AOS in 4 business days from the day they receive all the documents from me. I made sure I sent all the documents including Medical Exam results in less than 2 days from the day we had this call. Guess how long they took to file my case - 3 full weeks - 15 business days!!!!
For the kind of money they charge, the service is totally bad. FRA-DON'T-GO-MEN might be a better name these guys.
FRAGOMEN SUCKS TOTALLY - but unfortunately I got no choice - my employer uses these morons for immigration services. My reasoning is based on my experiences below:
1. I have been mailing Fragomen for 3 MONTHS (YES THREE FULL MONTHS) to initiate my H1 extn 6 months prior to my visa expiry cause I had a need to travel outside the US in a short notice and I did not want to be stuck because of me not having my visa extn papers in time. Despite 5 e-mails and 5 voice mails - there was no response from FRAGOMEN. Escalated this with my company and we had a conference call to discuss this issue with Fragomen. Guess what FRAGOMEN's Client Service Manager had to say when I asked her about they not answering my e-mails and voice mails for 3 months - "I CANNOT ANSWER THIS QUESTION SINCE EVERYCASE IS DEALT DIFFERENTLY AND WE DECIDED TO INITIATE UR H1 EXTN 3 MONTH PRIOR TO UR VISA EXPIRY." WTF!!! Who the hell are they to decide on my professional/personal travel needs? I really wish I had their job - do nothing at all and when questioned say "I cannot answer that question".
2. To make sure FRAGOMEN do not mess up my 485 as well, I asked them in the same call the time they would take to process and file my 485. The client service manager promised me that they would file my AOS in 4 business days from the day they receive all the documents from me. I made sure I sent all the documents including Medical Exam results in less than 2 days from the day we had this call. Guess how long they took to file my case - 3 full weeks - 15 business days!!!!
For the kind of money they charge, the service is totally bad. FRA-DON'T-GO-MEN might be a better name these guys.
more...
Hinglish
03-13 05:43 PM
Bharatpremi,
When do you think EB3-India will move to 2005? Any guess?
Best guess : in your life time
When do you think EB3-India will move to 2005? Any guess?
Best guess : in your life time
2010 quotes about rain. quotes about rain. quotes on
wanna_immigrate
05-19 02:56 PM
done ... and received response as well
more...
pmat
06-10 02:25 PM
Found this information in the current bulletin:
Seems like lot of predictions made by gurus in the other thread might come true.
VISA AVAILABILITY IN THE EMPLOYMENT-BASED CATEGORIES
Based on current indications of demand, the best case scenarios for cut-off dates which will be reached by the end of FY-2010 are as follows:
Employment First: Current
Employment Second:
China and India: March or April 2006
Employment Third:
Worldwide: June through September 2004
China: October through December 2003
India: February 2002
Mexico: Unavailable
Philippines: June through September 2004
Employment Fourth:
Worldwide: It may be necessary to establish a cut-off date for September.
Employment Fifth: Current
Seems like lot of predictions made by gurus in the other thread might come true.
VISA AVAILABILITY IN THE EMPLOYMENT-BASED CATEGORIES
Based on current indications of demand, the best case scenarios for cut-off dates which will be reached by the end of FY-2010 are as follows:
Employment First: Current
Employment Second:
China and India: March or April 2006
Employment Third:
Worldwide: June through September 2004
China: October through December 2003
India: February 2002
Mexico: Unavailable
Philippines: June through September 2004
Employment Fourth:
Worldwide: It may be necessary to establish a cut-off date for September.
Employment Fifth: Current
hair eautiful quotes on rain
gk_2000
03-26 11:57 PM
You make no sense man. I am not against EB3. I just said what I think, and I can be wrong too. If you dont like this just ignore or give your view on how it justified to change the line in the middle of the game.
MC
You are right in acknowledging that you may be wrong. Where you may be wrong? Maybe your "opinion" that EB2 should be given GC first before a single EB3 is entertained. Maybe the first-come-first-served argument is the valid one after all.
How does "my" argument make sense? I say, ok, give priority to EB2, but only within the same year. So, last years' EB3 has to be allocated first, before this year's EB2/EB3 are considered. And for this year, dont process EB3's unless EB2's for this year are done
But, do you realize, all our opinions are moot? Come back to reality, and we immigrant community as a whole, get to ask only ONE wish. Using your wisdom, what should that one wish be? Ikken Hissatsu. Kill with one blow.
MC
You are right in acknowledging that you may be wrong. Where you may be wrong? Maybe your "opinion" that EB2 should be given GC first before a single EB3 is entertained. Maybe the first-come-first-served argument is the valid one after all.
How does "my" argument make sense? I say, ok, give priority to EB2, but only within the same year. So, last years' EB3 has to be allocated first, before this year's EB2/EB3 are considered. And for this year, dont process EB3's unless EB2's for this year are done
But, do you realize, all our opinions are moot? Come back to reality, and we immigrant community as a whole, get to ask only ONE wish. Using your wisdom, what should that one wish be? Ikken Hissatsu. Kill with one blow.
more...
needhelp!
03-05 12:05 PM
Try this link to see USCIS response:
http://download206.mediafire.com/xwcsdggj4yjg/blrmnntd10w/FOIA_USCISResponse.pdf (http://www.mediafire.com/?blrmnntd10w)
(http://docs.google.com/gb?export=download&id=F.1f34f696-3d7f-4896-9224-e4b5ce4e92f8)
http://download206.mediafire.com/xwcsdggj4yjg/blrmnntd10w/FOIA_USCISResponse.pdf (http://www.mediafire.com/?blrmnntd10w)
(http://docs.google.com/gb?export=download&id=F.1f34f696-3d7f-4896-9224-e4b5ce4e92f8)
hot quotes about rain.
kate123
02-13 03:37 PM
Admin... Thank you for your response... Can we start an action item? Please advice
Thank you,
Kiran
Dear jchan,
We are very interested in this provision. Immigration Voice has heavily invested in this measure, both, legislatively and administrative. We have consistenly advocated for this provision which we believe will curb arm twisting by bad employers, that are like few bad apples in the big basket. Such a provision will help everyone including USCIS, lawyers, genuine companies, and direct+indirect beneficiary. Its a win-win for all.
.
Thank you,
Kiran
Dear jchan,
We are very interested in this provision. Immigration Voice has heavily invested in this measure, both, legislatively and administrative. We have consistenly advocated for this provision which we believe will curb arm twisting by bad employers, that are like few bad apples in the big basket. Such a provision will help everyone including USCIS, lawyers, genuine companies, and direct+indirect beneficiary. Its a win-win for all.
.
more...
house eautiful quotes on rain
MeraNoAayega
06-10 02:43 PM
you should see those dates in sep 2010 bulletin...:)
& hoping that most of the primary & dependent applicants have filed for their I-485's... the dates should not go back...:confused:
It has lot of good News >>>>
VISA AVAILABILITY IN THE EMPLOYMENT-BASED CATEGORIES
Based on current indications of demand, the best case scenarios for cut-off dates which will be reached by the end of FY-2010 are as follows:
Employment First: Current
Employment Second:
China and India: March or April 2006
Employment Third:
Worldwide: June through September 2004
China: October through December 2003
India: February 2002
Mexico: Unavailable
Philippines: June through September 2004
& hoping that most of the primary & dependent applicants have filed for their I-485's... the dates should not go back...:confused:
It has lot of good News >>>>
VISA AVAILABILITY IN THE EMPLOYMENT-BASED CATEGORIES
Based on current indications of demand, the best case scenarios for cut-off dates which will be reached by the end of FY-2010 are as follows:
Employment First: Current
Employment Second:
China and India: March or April 2006
Employment Third:
Worldwide: June through September 2004
China: October through December 2003
India: February 2002
Mexico: Unavailable
Philippines: June through September 2004
tattoo quotes on rain. sad quotes about rain. lilo777
chantu
06-28 07:53 PM
Hey Dhundhun,
I have one more question.
In EAD form, Q.11 Which USCIS center and Date(s).
What date we have to write? I am trying to fill up the pdf electronically. So it is allowing me to write only one date. So it should be the start date of previous EAD or end date? or range of date like 07/11/2008 - 07/12/2009
I have one more question.
In EAD form, Q.11 Which USCIS center and Date(s).
What date we have to write? I am trying to fill up the pdf electronically. So it is allowing me to write only one date. So it should be the start date of previous EAD or end date? or range of date like 07/11/2008 - 07/12/2009
more...
pictures rain love quotes; quotes on
chanduv23
02-28 04:38 PM
I went through layoff and got the same response from my lawyer. The day you are not working, you are technically out of status. But I found a job in few weeks the gap between the h1b transfer is May 26th to July 1st. It was technically more than a month.
But these are done on a case to case basis, at times based on your good standing, and skills.
So though I was given 2 weeks pay in lieu of notice (as I was fired without notice), all my accrued vacation (2 weeeks) and 2 months of severance pay, lawyer told me I cannot count that as period of extended pay after layoff. So, I definitely walked a tight rope here.
But these are done on a case to case basis, at times based on your good standing, and skills.
So though I was given 2 weeks pay in lieu of notice (as I was fired without notice), all my accrued vacation (2 weeeks) and 2 months of severance pay, lawyer told me I cannot count that as period of extended pay after layoff. So, I definitely walked a tight rope here.
dresses charlie chaplin quotes rain.
bobzibub
07-05 11:15 PM
Everbody's posts here are speculations on what USCIS will do ...
Geez.....you definitely need a brain check.
:D :D :D
Say at USCIS's "mid month" meeting, they are discussing the major points:
<conference call service> badoop! badoop! badoop! badoop!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: OK, it is 11:30, everyone ready for our morning bi-monthly call?
Jonathan Scharfen, Deputy Director: I'm Here Dr. Emilio!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez: <muffled> I bet you would be brown no....
Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel: Mr. Melmed, Esq., Present!
<all>: Yesssss!
<conference call service> badoop!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: OK, who is late! Who is it! Speak up!
Jonathan Scharfen, Deputy Director: I think it was Jeffrey! I got a virus last week and he..
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: Enough Jonathan!
Jeffrey Conklin, Chief Information Officer: I'm here. I was just instructing our IT staff how to reboot the talky thingy phone system.
Jonathan Scharfen, Deputy Director: You mean the "V.O.I.P. Call Center."
Jeffrey Conklin, Chief Information Officer: I know I was going to...
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: Enough Jonathan! I'm not inviting you next meeting if you continue this. Lets get started! Now Lynden. You there? What is that status of this class action suit? My girlfriend said I was wearing a "class action suit"!!
<all> lol!
<all> lol!
<all> lol!
Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel: Well, we umm...
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: Come on Lynden, out with it..
Jonathan Scharfen, Deputy Director: I think that we should counter sue..
<all> Shut up Jonathan!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: Lynden! I've had it up to here with your dithering: Out with it man!
Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel: Ummm... they might have a case sir.
Rendell Jones, Chief Financial Officer: What do you (ahem, this is Rendell) What do you mean a case Lynden?
Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel: Well, it is just that in order to make our organization a profit center as per Presidential directive #232322, we did a little boo boo.
Rendell Jones, Chief Financial Officer: I want to state here and now that I advised against it!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: Shut up Rendell!! Lynden! You make those foreigners and their case GO AWAY! That is our job, to make them GO AWAY! Don't you know that that is what we do here? How long have you been here Jones? Not much longer at this rate!!! Rendell! Were do we stand with this. It is July and the board has not finished our bi-annual bonus calculations yet. This smells like trouble. What are you going to do Rendell??? RENDELLLLL???
Rendell Jones, Chief Financial Officer: Umm, well the new schedule kicks in next month. We plan on holding the July applications hostage until we get them paying new rates.
Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel: Can you do that?
Rendell Jones, Chief Financial Officer: You're the lawyer Lynden! You want your bonus or not???
Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel: Oh. We,umm can't do that! Is that why we? Oh crap.
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: Rendell!!!! Was this your idea???
Jonathan Scharfen, Deputy Director: Yes it was! I saw the memo! I'll fax it to you if...
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director:Jonathan, you're getting staticy, I'm disconnecting you. Call back later!
<conference call service> <badoop> "Scharfen, Jonathan....Disconnected."
Jeffrey Conklin, Chief Information Officer: There's nothing wrong with the v.o.i.p. system sir!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: hmmmmph.
Jeffrey Conklin, Chief Information Officer: In fact we're really busy with that call center. Phones are ringing off the hook!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: As long as they don't get my number!
<all> lol!
<all> lol!
Geez.....you definitely need a brain check.
:D :D :D
Say at USCIS's "mid month" meeting, they are discussing the major points:
<conference call service> badoop! badoop! badoop! badoop!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: OK, it is 11:30, everyone ready for our morning bi-monthly call?
Jonathan Scharfen, Deputy Director: I'm Here Dr. Emilio!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez: <muffled> I bet you would be brown no....
Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel: Mr. Melmed, Esq., Present!
<all>: Yesssss!
<conference call service> badoop!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: OK, who is late! Who is it! Speak up!
Jonathan Scharfen, Deputy Director: I think it was Jeffrey! I got a virus last week and he..
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: Enough Jonathan!
Jeffrey Conklin, Chief Information Officer: I'm here. I was just instructing our IT staff how to reboot the talky thingy phone system.
Jonathan Scharfen, Deputy Director: You mean the "V.O.I.P. Call Center."
Jeffrey Conklin, Chief Information Officer: I know I was going to...
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: Enough Jonathan! I'm not inviting you next meeting if you continue this. Lets get started! Now Lynden. You there? What is that status of this class action suit? My girlfriend said I was wearing a "class action suit"!!
<all> lol!
<all> lol!
<all> lol!
Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel: Well, we umm...
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: Come on Lynden, out with it..
Jonathan Scharfen, Deputy Director: I think that we should counter sue..
<all> Shut up Jonathan!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: Lynden! I've had it up to here with your dithering: Out with it man!
Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel: Ummm... they might have a case sir.
Rendell Jones, Chief Financial Officer: What do you (ahem, this is Rendell) What do you mean a case Lynden?
Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel: Well, it is just that in order to make our organization a profit center as per Presidential directive #232322, we did a little boo boo.
Rendell Jones, Chief Financial Officer: I want to state here and now that I advised against it!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: Shut up Rendell!! Lynden! You make those foreigners and their case GO AWAY! That is our job, to make them GO AWAY! Don't you know that that is what we do here? How long have you been here Jones? Not much longer at this rate!!! Rendell! Were do we stand with this. It is July and the board has not finished our bi-annual bonus calculations yet. This smells like trouble. What are you going to do Rendell??? RENDELLLLL???
Rendell Jones, Chief Financial Officer: Umm, well the new schedule kicks in next month. We plan on holding the July applications hostage until we get them paying new rates.
Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel: Can you do that?
Rendell Jones, Chief Financial Officer: You're the lawyer Lynden! You want your bonus or not???
Lynden Melmed, Chief Counsel: Oh. We,umm can't do that! Is that why we? Oh crap.
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: Rendell!!!! Was this your idea???
Jonathan Scharfen, Deputy Director: Yes it was! I saw the memo! I'll fax it to you if...
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director:Jonathan, you're getting staticy, I'm disconnecting you. Call back later!
<conference call service> <badoop> "Scharfen, Jonathan....Disconnected."
Jeffrey Conklin, Chief Information Officer: There's nothing wrong with the v.o.i.p. system sir!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: hmmmmph.
Jeffrey Conklin, Chief Information Officer: In fact we're really busy with that call center. Phones are ringing off the hook!
Dr. Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director: As long as they don't get my number!
<all> lol!
<all> lol!
more...
makeup quotes about rain. quotes from
belmontboy
03-27 12:44 AM
@smuggymba
Your's is not a valid argument - you didn't apply so other people shouldn't apply. .
-CinBoy
(EB2)
He's not cribbing about missed opportunities.
You missed his argument's main point.
Your's is not a valid argument - you didn't apply so other people shouldn't apply. .
-CinBoy
(EB2)
He's not cribbing about missed opportunities.
You missed his argument's main point.
girlfriend Romantic Rain Quotes and; quotes on rain. Rain - Amazing Cool Pictures
needhelp!
02-15 11:08 AM
Very good! Hope to get some more today.
hairstyles sad quotes about rain.
J_Brown77
06-15 10:54 PM
I guess this is the best thing to do, to upgrade my current EB2, and apply for an EB3. I hope this will expedite thins around here. Looking forward to more good things come.
senglory
02-14 08:19 PM
I arrived in the USA on 02/04. By current time I haven't been assigned to to any client's project which my bodyshop promised me. Also he have'n paid me yet even a single paycheck. I started to find another company which could do transfer my h1b. Is it real without any paycheck at all?
sledge_hammer
03-05 09:20 AM
Count me in for the contribution...
No comments:
Post a Comment